> On July 18, 2011, 3:19 p.m., Sven Langkamp wrote:
> > Having two windows side by side introduces lots of other problem:
> > -It would bring back the jumping when switching views, because dockers 
> > would be hidden and shown all the time.
> > -You can't have the dockers on one side of the screen as there are two 
> > different windows.
> > -You need a good window manager, so that on splitting the windows appear 
> > side by side.
> > 
> > Some of the problems with the current system are there because we tried to 
> > avoid those problems e.g. we switch the dockers internally to avoid the 
> > jumping. The problem you pointed out a purely implementation problems and 
> > not problems with the design of the UI. I don't think that we should change 
> > the UI just because the implementation isn't working.
> 
> Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>     Yes, I agree in principle... But the design limits the usefulness because 
> we cannot have two different documents in one window in any case, and given 
> the problems we have had over the years with this feature I doubt that we 
> will manage to have it fixed. And there are so many crashes and every new 
> docker makes it likely we'll get one more crash that I don't think trying to 
> fix this ancient code is worth it.  It's not like other apps all have this 
> feature -- LibreOffice doesn't. But I'd welcome a patch that really fixes 
> split view -- though whether that should be based on the current, very 
> ancient, code, I don't know.
> 
> Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>     Interestingly, MyPaint is adding split view functionality... But they do 
> it sort of right: they can have both vertical and horizontal splits in one 
> window. I'm wondering whether it wouldn't be a good idea to make a fresh 
> start for Calligra, with something that allows all those missing features.
> 
> Sven Langkamp wrote:
>     As far as I can see MyPaint does a few things differently. Views only 
> control how the image is display, everything else it shared between the 
> views. In Calligra there is a hard seperation and only the document itself is 
> shared between the view. I wonder if it wouldn't be better to share at least 
> some (or maybe everything) things between the views.
>     
>     The main problem is the old KPart approach to do the splitting. That 
> really inflexible and doesn't allow us to fix some of the problem that we are 
> currently facing.

Okay... Looking forward at the 2.4 release, I see no way that we can solve the 
split view bugs for that release. I still suggest we apply this patch for 2.4 
and use the sprint to scope out a new split view architecture.


- Boudewijn


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101993/#review4819
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 18, 2011, 1:03 p.m., Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101993/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 18, 2011, 1:03 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Calligra.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> This patch removes the buggy split-view functionality from KoMainWindow. 
> split-view has a number of problems:
> 
> * crashes when removing views
> * duplicates the actions so when a view is split you cannot e.g. delete a 
> shape with the delete key
> * it is limited in that it can only show views on one document, instead of 
> splitting the view and then making it possible to show several documents 
> side-by-side
> 
> After discussion on irc, we felt it was better to let the window manager 
> handle side-by-side views. To that end, a patch to optionally hide dockers if 
> the window loses focus will follow.
> 
> 
> This addresses bugs 239309, 265200, 277953, and 278000.
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=239309
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265200
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277953
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=278000
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   flow/part/flow.rc bd2913a 
>   karbon/data/karbon.rc 18c7156 
>   kpresenter/part/stage.rc d48fd3c 
>   kpresenter/stage.rc 3e0f53d 
>   krita/krita.rc 3d5d85d 
>   libs/main/KoDocument.cpp 515911a 
>   libs/main/KoMainWindow.h d44aff6 
>   libs/main/KoMainWindow.cpp c629827 
>   tables/tables.rc 0fde1b6 
>   words/part/words.rc 4e10d36 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101993/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Started several apps, opened and closed documents.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Boudewijn
> 
>

_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

Reply via email to