mazen Adel commented on a discussion on testsuites/psxtests/psxhdrs/dlfcn/dladdr.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/497#note_124514 > + * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. > + * > + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS > IS" > + * AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE > + * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR > PURPOSE > + * ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE > + * LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR > + * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF > + * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS > + * INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN > + * CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) > + * ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF > THE > + * POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. > + */ > + > +#define _NETBSD_SOURCE Should I make a separate merge request for updating `dlfcn.h`? I'm assuming the guard will be changed to `_NETBSD_SOURCE || __POSIX_VISIBLE >= 202405` and in the test we will define both correct ? I checked libdl and it `cpukit/libdl` and it doesn't have any references to `dladdr()`. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/497#note_124514 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list bugs@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
