Joel Sherrill created an issue: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5250
Assignee: Joel Sherrill ## Summary spstdc17 triggers this warning for [cpuimpl.h:220](https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/blame/main/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h?ref_type=heads#L220). ``` In file included from ../../../cpukit/include/rtems/score/percpu.h:43, from ../../../cpukit/include/rtems/score/threaddispatch.h:41, from ../../../testsuites/support/include/tmacros.h:50, from ../../../testsuites/sptests/spstdc17/init.c:34: ../../../cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h:220:17: warning: file-scope declaration of '_SPARC_Per_CPU_current' specifies 'register' [-Wpedantic] 220 | register struct Per_CPU_Control *_SPARC_Per_CPU_current asm( "g6" ); | ^~~~~~~ ``` Discussion in weekly meeting resulted in general consensus that the register keyword was never more than a hint at block scope level. It has not meaning at the file scope level. Moreover, the register keyword has been eliminated in later versions of both C and C++. See [CPP Reference](https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/storage_duration). Recommended fix for this warning is to remove the register keyword. ### Pre-set options -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5250 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list bugs@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
