Amar Takhar commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/288#note_115132 We could just keep what we have short and also store the full hash as much as cutting it makes sense if the argument is the git hash could change in the future then what's "short" could change, too. So I would store both a pre-shortened version that we use and also store the full hash for others to use in production. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/288#note_115132 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list bugs@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs