Amar Takhar commented on a discussion: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/288#note_115132


We could just keep what we have short and also store the full hash as much as 
cutting it makes sense if the argument is the git hash could change in the 
future then what's "short" could change, too.  So I would store both a 
pre-shortened version that we use and also store the full hash for others to 
use in production.

-- 
View it on GitLab: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/288#note_115132
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


_______________________________________________
bugs mailing list
bugs@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs

Reply via email to