On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 12:28:04PM -0700, martian67 wrote:
>
> > Are you implying that these panics do not occur if your athn(4) hostap
> > is in 11a/g mode instead of 11n? That would be useful to know.
> >
>
> Sorry I was not more explicit with my testing, running an ifconfig
> random up/down loop + a random re-association loop on the client, when
> placed into g mode there does not appear to be an issue after about half
> an hour (This card does not support 802.11a). It does indeed appear to
> be restricted to 802.11n.
>
Could you please try this diff and tell me if it makes a difference?
diff 85d5a2d13c62494befd8404b760a73f8146aa70a /usr/src
blob - 24fd9c068968a041fcff497be8fdaa8705995001
file + sys/net80211/ieee80211_input.c
--- sys/net80211/ieee80211_input.c
+++ sys/net80211/ieee80211_input.c
@@ -210,11 +210,29 @@ ieee80211_input(struct ifnet *ifp, struct mbuf *m, str
tid = 0;
}
- if (type == IEEE80211_FC0_TYPE_DATA && hasqos &&
+ if (ic->ic_state == IEEE80211_S_RUN &&
+ type == IEEE80211_FC0_TYPE_DATA && hasqos &&
(subtype & IEEE80211_FC0_SUBTYPE_NODATA) == 0 &&
- !(rxi->rxi_flags & IEEE80211_RXI_AMPDU_DONE)) {
+ !(rxi->rxi_flags & IEEE80211_RXI_AMPDU_DONE)
+#ifndef IEEE80211_STA_ONLY
+ && (ic->ic_opmode == IEEE80211_M_STA || ni != ic->ic_bss)
+#endif
+ ) {
int ba_state = ni->ni_rx_ba[tid].ba_state;
+#ifndef IEEE80211_STA_ONLY
+ if (ic->ic_opmode == IEEE80211_M_HOSTAP) {
+ if (!IEEE80211_ADDR_EQ(wh->i_addr1,
+ ic->ic_bss->ni_bssid)) {
+ ic->ic_stats.is_rx_wrongbss++;
+ goto err;
+ }
+ if (ni->ni_state != IEEE80211_S_ASSOC) {
+ ic->ic_stats.is_rx_notassoc++;
+ goto err;
+ }
+ }
+#endif
/*
* If Block Ack was explicitly requested, check
* if we have a BA agreement for this RA/TID.
