Follow-up Comment #6, bug #51338 (project make):
> …, but I can't tell exactly what aspects of the current capabilities you
want to be different.
This one is more a feature request.
> That's not a design,
But I find that a selection of two rules could fit into this area.
> it's basically a request to "please make things better".
Yes, this is also true.
Can the make function library be an update candidate?
> … examples of a new makefile syntax …
I expressed such a desire in other issues. But this issue belongs more to the
clarification for general design patterns of the make software.
> … you spend a huge amount of time …
It is a simple approach so far. The efforts might increase as usual during our
constructive dialogue.
> … so they must be more than just a slightly different way to get the same
results.
Can you get into the mood to clarify the application of design/construction
patterns a bit more for make?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51338>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
