Follow-up Comment #4, bug #51338 (project make):
> You don't need to use secondary expansion inside the recipe, because you
already have access to the automatic variables like $@ there.
I thought about a need for a “second expansion” (for a moment) while it
could be implemented in the mentioned use case by another variable evaluation
(call of the make function “eval”).
> If you have a specific design in mind please post it here with explicit
examples and discussion of exactly how it would work and I'll reopen this
enhancement request.
I tried this way.
I suggest to give some make rule combinations (pairs, trios, …) another
look.
Which of them can become part of a higher level make standard library?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51338>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
