> From: Orgad Shaneh <org...@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 15:59:09 +0300 > Cc: bug-make@gnu.org > > I don't see any calls to DeleteFile in this log. I expected to see at > least one that failed with ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED. What am I missing? > > There is SHARING_VIOLATION for both g++.exe and mingw32-make.exe
Ah, okay. But then the problem is not with child processes of g++, it's with g++ itself, right? And on my system, the file is removed after Make exits, when I use your recipe. > > Interleaved output is not a problem, it's expected behavior. And it > > has nothing to do with buffering, since several different instances of > > make are simultaneously writing to the same device. > > By "interleaved" I mean that in the same line there is "expected" output and > interferences. This happens even > without -j. In the example that I gave in that bug report, it was caused by > ^C, which looked like this: > > make: *** Deleting file 'obj/m^ainC.oTerminate batch job (Y/N)? ' > Is this expected? The "*** Deleting file 'obj/main.o" part is from Make, while the "Terminate batch job (Y/N)?" part is from cmd.exe. IOW, two processes are writing to the same device at the same time. > With the patch it doesn't happen. That's what I'd like to understand: how did the MSYS2 maintainers arrived at the conclusion that the call to setlocale can be related. _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
