It would help if you can post a /minimal/ makefile that demonstrates the problem.right here - there is no fewer statements that can be done to make a makefile which creates a makefile which creates a makefile (and no that's not redunant). It was a attached - here it is done verbatim.
I suppose I can strip off the remake - since if make actually worked, it would be unessecary....
.PHONY: all
all: ;
include ticks
ticks: Makefile bob dillon
@echo TICKS=$(patsubst %ILI,%L,$(patsubst %XXXXIX,%IL,$(patsubst %IXI,%X,$(patsubst %VIV,%IX,$(patsubst %IVI,%V,$(patsubst %IIII,%IV,$(TICKS)I))))))>ticks
@echo Prior Ticks : $(TICKS)
include x
bob dillon:
@echo . >$@;x:Makefile bob dillon
@echo include y >x
@echo y: $@ $? >>x
@echoto -c x @echo fakeall: \>y
@echoto -c x @./echoto -c y @echo hey we made it:$(TICKS)Makefile: ;
_______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
