On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Paul D. Smith wrote: > %% Fabio Alemagna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > fa> Ok. Do you know if it still compiles on AmigaOS with ixemul (the > fa> posix layer)? Well, I guess I can just try and see... > > No one has reported that it doesn't, but I'm not sure if anyone has > tried in a while. I don't have an Amiga system so I can't try it > myself.
I tried a cross compile from linux and it worked, except for a few things which I had to tweak by hand. The first issue, is that even if it was cross compiling, it tried to use the host's 'ar' command. I solved that by invoking m68k-amigaos-ar by hand and letting make run again, however that should be fixed at the source. The other problem is that in signame.c it checks whether SYS_SIGLIST_DECLARED is defined, however in config.h HAVE_DECL_SYS_SIGLIST is used (and defined, if that has to be the case), which created problems because signame.c defines sys_siglist[NSIG] and the standard includes declare sys_siglist[], creating an obvious conflict. Again, I fixed this by hand in config.h, defining SYS_SIGLIST_DECLARED. Both issues don't seem to be dependent on AmigaOS, they just show up in that particular configuration. Can you fix those, or should I prepare a patch? > Not really. I don't believe it will (again, barring bugs--and I'm > not aware of any right now), but I've not done any real measurements. Ok, I'll see what comes out... Thanks, Fabio Alemagna _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
