On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Paul D. Smith wrote: > fa> the next make release to be expected? > > Sometime, before too long. I'm trying to get the MINGW and OS/2 support > integrated for this release.
Ok. Do you know if it still compiles on AmigaOS with ixemul (the posix layer)? Well, I guess I can just try and see... > Barring bugs, though, I don't see any reason why $(eval ...) should be > any more memory or performance intensive than include. It's all the > same code. Ok, then the question translates into this one: how big can a BIG make file be? I mean, I'm going to use one big makefile for a large project (AROS, http://www.aros.org/), switching from the current build system which uses a lot of different tools and about 600 makefiles whose average size is of 212 lines: now, do you have any rough idea on whether make will consume a lot of memory and on whether it will be slow? Sorry, I kow all this doesn't belong to this list... if you feel I should email you privately, or post to another ML, please tell me. Fabio Alemagna _______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
