On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 18:57 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Diego Nieto Cid, on Wed 04 Nov 2015 10:50:35 -0300, wrote: > > assert (__hurd_local_reply_port == arg || arg == MACH_PORT_NULL) > > > > AIUI any other values are bogus given how 'mig_get_reply_port' and > > 'mig_dealloc_reply_port' are meant to be paired. > > That's probably a good thing to do, yes.
What's wrong with? mach_port_t port = __hurd_local_reply_port; assert (port == arg || arg == MACH_PORT_NULL) Additionally, any strong reason to not change mig??