Hi 2015-11-04 6:30 GMT-03:00 Svante Signell <svante.sign...@gmail.com>: > > Diego, > Cc: bug-hurd.
Oh, I mistakenly hit 'Reply'. I hate when that happens :( > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 15:55 -0300, Diego Nieto Cid wrote: > > > I'd suggest to assert (port == arg || arg == MACH_PORT_NULL) just to > > be sure users don't expect > > other port to be deallocated, which would be a bug. > > See above. > Hmm, I should have written assert (__hurd_local_reply_port == arg || arg == MACH_PORT_NULL) AIUI any other values are bogus given how 'mig_get_reply_port' and 'mig_dealloc_reply_port' are meant to be paired. May be someone more knowledgeable can shed some ligth to the issue. > > > > [*]...probably because of this :) > > Why not change mig, is it holy? No. I just meant whoever wrote that code wasn't willing or didn't have the time to engage in such a task.
