Re: [PATCH 16/28] ddb/db_command.c (db_command): use db_addr_t instead of db_expr_t

[Samuel Thibault]

Marin Ramesa, le Sun 08 Dec 2013 12:40:18 +0100, a écrit :
> In this way there are two casts less.

Yes, but

> -         addr = (db_expr_t)db_next;

This kind of cast is preferrable to 

> +             if (db_expression((db_expr_t *)&addr)) {

that one, because whatever the actual sizes, the first is correct, while
the second won't necessarily.

Samuel