Hi! In GNU Mach, we have a version.m4 where these fields are defined one and for all. (I argue that a package's version definition does not really belong into a generic, otherwise version-agnostic configuration system's file.) (But on the other hand, *version*.m4 is likely not the most suitable name for defining a package's name.) (Are we bike-shedding yet?)
Should/could we also get rid of libhurdbugaddr? (Separate patch?) I never quite understood its purpose. On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:41:16 +0100, [email protected] (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) wrote: > (Then again, deriving shared library names from the package release > number doesn’t feel optimal to me (info "(libtool) Release numbers").) Yes, that too... Grüße, Thomas
pgpxkOVtn27FO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
