Hi, On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:05:51PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:31:26AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > And that means: nothing missing, nsmux works as it should? > > Apparently, nsmux is capable of performing a basic subset of > functionality it was designed to be capable of doing. I can remember > myself trying a number (not a considerable one, though) of tests that > proved that nsmux starts translators nicely, but I never tried to see > whether anonymous translators went away on their own. > > You'd better wait until antrik has his final answer to this question, Not sure what question you mean... -antrik-
