On Friday 09 July 2010 14:32:52 Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > Yes, you can kill them manually, but nsmux does nothing about dead > control ports; this memory leak you cannot avoid easily :-( > Nevertheless, I'd expect that killing translators won't have other bad > effect than leaving nsmux with invalid control ports: nsmux only uses > control ports for closing the translators when it itself closes.
But here the size of the memory leak is on the scale of one control port per started translator, isn’t it? So it would be constantly growing, but not by that much (as long as nsmux isn’t used for constant querying or similar). How much is missing to make nsmux close translators again? Best wishes, Arne -- Ein Würfel System - einfach saubere Regeln: - http://1w6.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
