Hi, On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Sergiu Ivanov<unlimitedscol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > This makes me suspect that eth-multiplexer is not the troublesome > component we are looking for. Do you share this opinion or do you > still insist on my trying to deprive eth-multiplexer of the > functionality of setting the device in promiscuous mode?
Since the modified pfinet cannot work either, the problem should be in pfinet. I wonder what modification in pfinet can cause the problem. If you'd like to, you can patch the original pfinet with my patches in the following order and test it. 1. patch #6619: pfinet uses the virtual interface 2. patch #6620: pfinet changes its filter rules with its IP address 3. patch #6621: pfinet sets the mach device into the promiscuous mode. 4. patch #6622: pfinet uses the BPF filter It should be very helpful for us to locate the problematic patch. Zheng Da
