Hello! On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 07:16:05PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 03 Jan 2007 13:18:18 +0100, a ?crit : > > So, feel free to create a branch, perhaps called > > `gnumach-1-branch-Xen-branch' or similar. > > Ok. Before that, just a little check: Xen provides some public headers > for making easier to implement doms, the COPYING file is as follows: > > XEN NOTICE > ========== > > This copyright applies to all files within this subdirectory. > > Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy > of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to > deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the > rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or > sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is > furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: > > The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in > all copies or substantial portions of the Software. > > THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR > IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, > FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE > AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER > LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING > FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER > DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. > > Is this OK to include in GNU Mach ?
This is called the ``X11 License'' (see <http://www.xfree86.org/3.3.6/COPYRIGHT2.html#3>) and is compatible with the GPL, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#X11License>. Someone may want to double-check, I only had a quick look. > > How shall we keep it with the ChangeLog? Do you intend to write entries > > for each patch you check in into the new branch? > > I don't think I'll write ChangeLog entries for now, since a bunch of > changes will probably disappear (panic()s here and there, TODOs, ...). > Then I'll probably only write one ChangeLog entry, so it will be easy to > merge it. Is this okay with the other Hurd maintainers? Regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
