Hey,
thanks for trying stomach out and for even getting a log.
On 8/26/05, Shakthi Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find the console response to be much faster than
> gnumach. Have you given lot of printfs during the boot
> code?
Faster? Hmm, perhaps there are just a lot of printfs and so everything
seems to scroll faster, since the console driver is exactly the same.
> The startup bootlog sequence on the T41:
Wow, That's that IS useful!
> vm_page_grab: no dma anymoremem_free: hash search
> failed (0)!
See, this seems to be a very very bad thing. Even if I almost rewrote
that piece of code recently. It was immorally broken.
> It probes for floppy and spends lot of time there. Can
> I disable the floppy detection?
Hmm, by hacking a bit the code. Perhaps I/we should make this option
available in the configure script. But I want to wait for this, since
I want to rationalize the configure/automake thing by following recent
GNU Mach changes affecting these scripts.
Gianluca
--
It was a type of people I did not know, I found them very strange and
they did not inspire confidence at all. Later I learned that I had been
introduced to electronic engineers.
E. W. Dijkstra
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
