> I have to use './configure [...] --prefix=[...] > --with-headers=[...]' because I have every package installed > into its own hierarchy of > > Then your system is broken.
That's an interesting definition of "broken" you're using here. The need for that flag alone makes your systen broken. > Everyone, feel free to ask questions if you want to know more > about that system. > > It all seems like a basterdised version of stowfs/packagefs. If that is the niveau you decide to use to discuss methods that are new to you, different from those you're already used to, then there is no use in continuing this "discussion" with you. Now you are being really silly... Can't you even take some simple criticisim without having to resort to these silly things? What you presented is indeed a silly and basterdised version of stowfs/packagefs. Nor is it "new", infact it is quite old. I was under the assumption that the Hurd people (I'm aware that only Alfed replied so far) would be interested in replacing -- well, in some way -- deadlocked UNIX techniques with superior ones. Yes, and we do that, stowfs/packagefs is a example. What you presented was a basteredised version of it that is based on the same old "deadlocked UNIX techniques" but pretending to be "new" in some obscure way. Seriously, if you can't handle some criticism, don't ask for it to begin with. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
