On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 07:17:51PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Done: <URL:http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=765> > Is it correct that this was automatically assigned to > <URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>? At least, I'm not aware of having > changed anything. > > Thank you. Leave it as default, I think that is OK.
... and was resolved. > I needed the attached patches to make it compile. > > Yeah, I knew about those two, been in my tree for ages and never got > around to mailing them. Including some other fixes... Need to get > unbusy, hmph. Well, you finally did and they were applied on HEAD. Shouldn't they get applied on glibc-2_3-branch as well or do you only care to have HEAD compiling / running on GNU/Hurd? Alfred, what are your "other fixes"? Anything important for me to know? > Shall I open bugzilla requests for them? What's the policy for > such tiny changes? > > My policy has always been to send the patch to libc-alpha. But from > the looks, things have changed now. Roland, care to enlighten on how > you should report bugs to glibc now? It seems posting, waiting for some months and reposting suffices. :-) > and why aren't they noticed by other people? > > "They" don't compile or test glibc on GNU/Hurd. "They" are surely missing something! ;-) Regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
