On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 10:25, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > I don't ask you to change the way you work, but to consider > participating (at times) in something you reject to participate in. > And nothing of this is for the sake of Savannah, but for the sake of > this project. > > My bug reports have a better track record of getting fixed then any of > the stuff on Savannah. So for the sake of the project, people should > stop using the bug tracker.
If the topic of how well the bug database works can go on for this long, I feel like this may be another hurdle (haha) in the HURD's development. To the maintainers and large contributors: Would using another bug database system that is equally usable to the group be worth considering? I think everyone that contributes is dedicated enough to compromise in this respect. Many volunteer free software projects highly benefit from an effective bug database, especially when there is a large user-base. The speed at which a bug is discovered, and widely known as closed seems to be important. The whole world knows this though. Thanks for reading! -rian _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
