At Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:35:25 +0000, Neal H. Walfield wrote: > You might have a good point if the maintainers supported using > savannah. This is simple not the case. Roland, for instance, has > recently said [1] that he mostly ignores the messages from the > savannah patch manager as it is too difficult to find the relevant > information. (I don't know if this also excludes the bug reports that > the savannah bug manager sends to the lists as well, however.) > > [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2004-09/msg00071.html
It is true that the email notifications are mostly useless, and I usually only use them as an indication that something changed. If everyone agrees they are useless, we can disable them. It's simple enough to do. Or we could go and help the savannah people make them useful if we cared enough about it. But I do actually browse the savannah lists and sometimes pick up things to do. I also use them in close collaboration with Marco for console stuff. Marcus _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
