is hurd ever going to adopt OSKit, and should i focus on making my code work within OSKit, or would i just be better off working on my own flavor borrowing code from the aformentioned example along with what ever else i do?
Officially oskit-mach will become GNU Mach 2.x, but AFAIK noone is working on stabilizing it.
You should definately take a close look at wagi's work. But I don't know what to advice you about whether to patch GNU Mach 1 or GNU Mach 2. Probably GNU Mach 2 will be easier, because the infrastructure is already set up by wagi. If it's in GNU Mach 1, it will receive much wider use by people. I guess you first work on GNU Mach 2 and later backport it to GNU Mach 1. I have no idea how easy is to port something from oskit to GNU Mach 1.
Regards, ogi
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
