--- Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yaakov wrote:
> > is hurd ever going to adopt OSKit, and should i focus on making my
> code
> > work within OSKit, or would i just be better off working on my own
> > flavor borrowing code from the aformentioned example along with
> what
> > ever else i do?
>
> Officially oskit-mach will become GNU Mach 2.x, but AFAIK noone is
> working on stabilizing it.
>
> You should definately take a close look at wagi's work. But I don't
> know what to advice you about whether to patch GNU Mach 1 or GNU Mach
> 2.
> Probably GNU Mach 2 will be easier, because the infrastructure is
> already set up by wagi. If it's in GNU Mach 1, it will receive much
> wider use by people. I guess you first work on GNU Mach 2 and later
> backport it to GNU Mach 1. I have no idea how easy is to port
> something
> from oskit to GNU Mach 1.
i'm more focused on just making something that can be incorporated into
debian gnu/hurd so i can actually use my laptop to download packages,
source code etc... right now if hurd doesn't use gnu mach 2, then i
won't program for it (though I will try to keep my code as generic as
possible).
ps. sorry about sending that last message off the forum, yahoo mail is
a little limited and i have too many bad habits.
-Yaakov
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
