> The problem with having them still in the tree is that it's not obvious > at a quick glance which tools are pieces aer still in use and worth > learning when you're a new person. As an example, when James Morrison > was doing patch reviews and sending a patch nearly every week a frequent > response was "That code is never used".
This is an excellent reason for looking at releases, rather than leaving CVS as what we have instead of doing releases. You know that looking at the release of the Hurd (latest release is 0.2, and was released in 1997 if I am correct) is quite useless. :-) Still, is the unused code somehow filtered out from the source tree when a release is made? Hrm. Indeed. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
