On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 03:50, M. Gerards wrote: > > Also, is there a reason to keep bsdfsck, defpager and libtreefs > > around? About libtreefs I'm a bit unsure, since it might be useful. > > But I doubt this since it hasn't been touched since 1996 (there is not > > even a ChangeLog).
Is bsdfsck just fsck for ufs? If yes, it should probably be renamed for consistency. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- When you get to the heart, use a knife and fork. - From instructions on how to eat an artichoke.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd