On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 10:55:18PM +0100, José María Ruiz Aguilera wrote: > I have been talking with Wolfgang about that and he say that it will > be more interesting and usefull to implement shadowfs.
> What do you think about that? Is really more important a runing > shadowfs that a ReiserFS translator? The two serve quite different goals. The shadowfs translator solves a number of Hurdish problems, but doesn't give us reiserfs. Having a Journaling filesystem would be nice - But for me, ext3 would be way more useful. It would probably not only save you the grief of figuring out how to embed translators into reisersfs, but would probably become the most commonly used filesystem overnight. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- learning from failures is nice in theory... but in practice, it sucks :) - Wolfgang Jaehrling _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
