On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 01:00:02PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 09:45:09PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > > Ayup, I just see my mistake. We are setting -std=gnu99 in CPPFLAGS, > > not CFLAGS. D'oh! I will put the blame elsewhere then :) > > CFLAGS is certainly the wrong place for this, because it's required > for compilation (so it would violate the GCS). Automake seems to > provide AM_CFLAGS for this purpose, so that might not be a bad choice > for a name. (Or just keep the filter out for now).
We already violate the GCS on the CFLAGS issue (for example by relying on optimization, see tasks file), this can be cleaned up in your automake patches. It's way simpler to put it in CFLAGS than introduce a new variable in the current Makefiles. Thanks, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/ _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
