On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 08:22:38PM +0100, Neil Booth wrote: > Marcus Brinkmann wrote:- > > > That is my fault for not being precise enough in my bug report, sorry. > > > > The problem is that gcc calls the preprocessor with this ordering when > > compiling an assembler file (foo.S) with the -std=gnu99 option. > > > > Try "echo \# foo > foo.S" and "gcc -std=gnu99 -o foo foo.S", this triggers > > the bug. -v shows that gcc passes -std=gnu99 to cpp when preprocessing the > > file. > > Right, but everything you state is intentional. -lang-asm deliberately > comes first, otherwise it would clobber various other flags the user > may have passed, such as -fdollars-in-identifiers, -trigraphs etc. > > The problem you have is that -std=gnu99 applies to the C language, and > not to assembler. > > What is the reason you need to pass the switch? If it's to avoid a > spurious warning, we may be able to disable the warning if -lang-asm. > If it's to achieve some additional functionality, we may be able to > retain that functionality if -lang-asm.
Ayup, I just see my mistake. We are setting -std=gnu99 in CPPFLAGS, not CFLAGS. D'oh! I will put the blame elsewhere then :) Thanks a lot for your patience, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/ _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
