James A Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, I've grep'd through the hurd source looking for instances of errno being > assigned directly. These seem to be the places where setting errno isn't > right.
What's the reason for this? > I've also changed !var to var == MACH_PORT_NULL where appropriate > because some documentation, mach.texi, says MACH_PORT_NULL is not assumed to > be 0 in the Hurd system. This is always fine. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
