[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I already asked Marcus and Jeff on IRC whether OSKit-Mach is going to > > be gnumach 2.0. > > For what it's worth, I have no particular objection, however it's > really a sort of one-shot switch. Once we switch, we blow away the > old gnumach, and we're switched, with whatever bugs that entails.
Actually, I do have one concern. gnumach, right now, is very careful to conform (as best as we could make it) to the GNU Coding Standards, especially, those aspects like the way the configure script works. Currently OSKit doesn't seem to work that way (though please correct me to the extent I'm incorrect). That should be fixed before it becomes gnumach. Thomas _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
