Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface

[Neal H Walfield]

> > Basically, half of shmid_ds and retreived with
> > `shmctl (id, IPC_STAT, &shmid_ds)', e.g. number of current attaches,
> > shm_atime, shm_dtime and shm_ctime.
> 
> Blech.  Why not just keep track of that information in a file
> somewhere?

If I interpret what Roland says correctly, he is quite against this.

PGP signature