Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If sysvshm were some magical new kind of facility, it wouldn't be so easy
> to implement it with code just like other facilities we already have. So
> you can relate what the actual meat of the sysvshm functionality is to
> other facilities, and not just say "it does what it does". (My position is
> that if you do this you will find there is very little meat left. Then it
> will become clear how to implement the sysvshm C interfaces without wholly
> new servers.)
Roland is right here; he's trying to draw out of you the Right Way to
implement shm functions without writing such a brand new server.
Look carefully at his response, and you'll see the necessary clues. I
can fill you in if you like.
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
