Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
&> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 02:58:51PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I have a patch ready to go that changes all int -> int32 and off_t and
> > > ssize_t to int64. Do you want this. Would you like something else?
> >
> > No, I think this is the sort of thing we do when we are preparing to
> > start work on the 2.0 version.
>
> 2.0? We do not even have .3 and you are talking about 2.0? I can only
> imgine when that is if in March of 2000 .3 was ``coming out real soon
> now.'' Can you please explaines your plans so I can figure out if I want
> to contribute.
My point is that changing int->int32 is a cosmetic thing that doesn't
help any immediate release goals. (Changing int->int64 would be a
bug, as Roland points out.)
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
