> It would be better if we dropped the C type "int" entirely, and > changed to using the MiG type "int32" or "int64", which can then have > C typedefs to the right native types, and the whole thing would be > clearer. I have a patch ready to go that changes all int -> int32 and off_t and ssize_t to int64. Do you want this. Would you like something else? Neal
- [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs Neal H Walfield
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs Erik Verbruggen
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs Roland McGrath
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs Neal H Walfield
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs Roland McGrath
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs Neal H Walfield
- Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs Thomas Bushnell, BSG