Hello Carl, Here is my stdio.h from dico: https://clbin.com/7Ozb0
I could compile dico by removing the full if/undef sections in Makefile. That is wrong approach, but dico works on my side as of now, I did not test all functions yet. Jean Louis On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:57:23AM -0700, carl hansen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Jean Louis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello Carl, > > > > I have nothing changed. Compiled over 400+ packages in last 10 days, but > > few like dico do not work out of the box. > > > > I have gcc 5.3.0. How would I change settings to warning? > > > > Jean > > > > > > another thing about gets() > see man gets > " LSB deprecates gets(). POSIX.1-2008 marks gets() obsolescent. ISO C11 > removes the specification of gets() > from the C language, and since version 2.16, glibc header files > don't expose the function declaration if the > _ISOC11_SOURCE feature test macro is defined. > > It might be the case that your code doesn't recognize gets() is because > _ISOC11_SOURCE feature test macro is defined. > > > It would be better for all concerned if the original author wished to > maintain the program and fix it. > But we're all volunteers...
