Paul Eggert wrote: > Can we simply eliminate the type byte_count_t, and replace its uses with > sbyte_count_t?
Although I don't see an immediate need for that, that change would be OK, as far as I can see. Bruno
Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list Thu, 29 Oct 2026 15:40:44 -0700
Paul Eggert wrote: > Can we simply eliminate the type byte_count_t, and replace its uses with > sbyte_count_t?
Although I don't see an immediate need for that, that change would be OK, as far as I can see. Bruno