On 29/10/2026 21:23, Bruno Haible wrote:
Paul Eggert wrote:Can we simply eliminate the type byte_count_t, and replace its uses with sbyte_count_t?Although I don't see an immediate need for that, that change would be OK, as far as I can see.
I don't see a problem with that either, but it should be a separate future change. cheers, Padraig
