Following up to <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2024-11/msg00035.html>: > Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > I wonder if that test in AM_ICONV is relevant or useful anymore. > > Yes, it is relevant. Some of the PO file from the Japanese translators > at <https://translationproject.org/team/ja.html> still are in EUC-JP > encoding. When the corresponding .mo files are made with a GNU gettext > version older than 0.22, they are in EUC-JP as well, and when iconv() > does not support EUC-JP, gettext() will not be able to process these > translations. > > > Is an > > iconv with just the modules in "gconv-modules" considered "working"? > > No. > > > None of the gconv modules > > in gconv-modules-extra.conf (now split out since glibc-2.34) were > > enabled.
I have reported this problem to the glibc people: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32437 Bruno
