Recently, I had someone report a configure failure in my project, in
AM_ICONV's "checking for working iconv" test. This was on a GNU/Linux
distribution (Tiny Core Linux) using glibc, so they thought there
shouldn't be any issues with the iconv implementation.
After some investigation, it turned out that only the main
"gconv-modules" were enabled on their system. None of the gconv modules
in gconv-modules-extra.conf (now split out since glibc-2.34) were
enabled.
AM_ICONV has a "Test against HP-UX 11.11 bug: No converter from EUC-JP
to UTF-8 is provided." that was failing, because the main gconv-modules
no longer contains EUC-JP.
I wonder if that test in AM_ICONV is relevant or useful anymore. Is an
iconv with just the modules in "gconv-modules" considered "working"?
Would the gnulib developers consider removing that test?
Thank you,
-Kevin
- AM_ICONV failures on minimal gconv... Kevin J. McCarthy
-