Collin Funk wrote:
> > The latter invocation should list hamt-tests.
>
> Sure, no problem. I assume that since the 'module-tests' is implicit we
> just have to check for the existence of f'{self.name}-tests'.
Yes.
> > does not complete within a reasonable time.
>
> Yeah, that is the main reason that I wanted to look at it. You
> implemented this after Paul wanted to use it for 'c99' [1]. I noticed
> that one was very slow yesterday.
>
> $ time gnulib-tool --extract-recursive-dependents stdlib
> [...]
> real 0m52.093s
> user 0m10.577s
> sys 0m45.718s
>
> $ time gnulib-tool --extract-recursive-dependents c99
> [...]
> real 1m36.230s
> user 0m20.062s
> sys 1m24.070s
Whereas a single --extract-dependents invocation is fast:
$ time ./gnulib-tool --extract-dependents lock
asyncsafe-spin-tests
call_once-tests
clean-temp
clean-temp-simple
cond
cond-tests
fatal-signal
localename
localename-unsafe
mtx-tests
random
regex
ssfmalloc
strerror_r-posix
thread
tls-tests
real 0m0,163s
user 0m0,099s
sys 0m0,064s
Bruno
