Hi Bruno, Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> writes:
> It was intentional: I think a function that returns a set[GLModule] is > more reusable than a function that returns a string. > >> Now that I think of it I'm not sure why I return a string there. I think >> it is better to return a set and let the caller sort as they wish, >> format for printing, etc. > > You're right. Done: Thanks! Appreciated. Eventually I'll have a look at simplifying GLModule.getDependents. Adding tests beforehand of course so I don't break it.
