On 04/11/2018 09:53 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > @@ -1589,6 +1593,15 @@ mem1: saved_errno = errno; > tail->fts_link = p; > tail = p; > } > + > + /* If there are many entries, no sorting function has been > + specified, and this file system is of a type that may be > + slow with a large number of entries, arrange to sort the > + directory entries on increasing inode numbers. */ > + if (nitems == _FTS_INODE_SORT_DIR_ENTRIES_THRESHOLD ______________________________^^ > + && !sp->fts_compar) > + sort_by_inode = dirent_inode_sort_may_be_useful (cur, > dir_fd); > +
This looks wrong: didn't you mean the '>' operator? Thanks for digging into this issue. Have a nice day, Berny
