On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> wrote: > > On 04/05/2018 05:44 AM, Kamil Dudka wrote: >> >> Does this change (intentionally?) enable leaf optimization for CIFS? > > > No, I wasn't thinking about CIFS when I wrote that. Thanks for reporting it. I installed the attached to try to fix this. I have not tested it with CIFS. >
Where is the abort actually happening? If the abort is in fts itself, then this patch is a reasonable fix (though generally I prefer not to allow aborts in library code). But if the abort is in find itself (i.e. not in the gnulib code at all) then we should fix find (either as well, or instead). James.
