On 14-05-22 12:54 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > Kieran Colford wrote: >> I deliberately chose to use it as a macro and call it this because that >> is how it is done everywhere else in gnulib. > > Sure, but let's take this opportunity to do a better API, while we're > making a module for it. So my suggestion would be to replace STREQ with > streq uniformly elsewhere, after the stringops module is added. >
One issue with making it streq rather than STREQ: there already exists streq module (holding STREQ_OPT) and when a user is given a message from ``make syntax-check'' telling them to use streq, they will look to the streq module. If we intend to make the names so similar, then I think it would be justified to merge the stringops module with the streq module.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
