Kieran Colford wrote:
I deliberately chose to use it as a macro and call it this because that is how it is done everywhere else in gnulib.
Sure, but let's take this opportunity to do a better API, while we're making a module for it. So my suggestion would be to replace STREQ with streq uniformly elsewhere, after the stringops module is added.
I think Jim Meyering is the main reason Gnulib uses STREQ so much, so I'd like his opinion. Jim, is it OK if we make the changes described in <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2014-05/msg00040.html> when creating a module that implements a STREQ-like operation?
