Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > Although it is common to see, e.g. Mac OS X 10.5 in writing, it's > redundant and technically incorrect.
Possibly. But when discussing gnulib, I want to never evoke the impression that gnulib could support MacOS 9 or earlier. > or use the cat name > > Mac OS X Leopard > Mac OS Leopard Certainly not. In gnulib the version numbers and the order among version numbers is very important. And there's no natural ordering among the predator names "Leopard", "Panther", "Tiger" that would be easy to remember. Even where such an order exists, e.g. between "Hardy", "Intrepid", "Karmic", and "Lucid", version numbers carry more information. Bruno -- In memoriam Robert Blum <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Blum>
