On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> wrote: > I find it reasonable to use "#ifdef PATH_MAX" in front of every use of > PATH_MAX, like POSIX requires.
I agree. I think it would be helpful if there were some automated way of reminding people to do that though. Many people develop on systems which define PATH_MAX but would want their code to build and work correctly on systems that do not. Is the current syntax-check system flexible enough to warn about uses of PATH_MAX outside an #idfef PATH_MAX conditional? James.
